This post is from what I've gathered...
Here, it appears that the purpose of the Crowdfund Backer banner is to let the funders stand out. Best example: Compare mine with this that I screen-shotted from Mane6 (User) :
Now look at someone who doesn't have the banner. Something at a very dark color, much darker than the admin color, would make the entire purpose of it null and void.
I'm not saying I disagree with changing it, nor am I saying I agree with it, I just think that staying bright is still a good idea.
I'll definitely be weighing in my own opinions later.
Name colors is a different story here. I know you remember that back in the days on that site, there were people with multiple titles that could only have one color for their username. This was when banners DID exist under the names. The system for it assigns an ID to each user and gives the user that color and effect ID henceforth whenever their username is loaded. I can no longer tell how the banner was associated no how much further in detail that goes, however.Agreed, it does seems a little garish at the moment. If they want to keep the colored banner, perhaps a lavender or something that doesn't contrast as much? Or perhaps, if they reverted the banner to the more discreet one but wanted to keep the backer status eye-catching, they could change the color of the usernames instead. (which is possible on XenForo forums as can be seen here)
Here, it appears that the purpose of the Crowdfund Backer banner is to let the funders stand out. Best example: Compare mine with this that I screen-shotted from Mane6 (User) :
Now look at someone who doesn't have the banner. Something at a very dark color, much darker than the admin color, would make the entire purpose of it null and void.
I'm not saying I disagree with changing it, nor am I saying I agree with it, I just think that staying bright is still a good idea.
I'll definitely be weighing in my own opinions later.
Last edited: